Background and Purpose Present criteria for the diagnosis of moyamoya
disease emphasize the use of conventional cerebral angiography as an i
ndispensable requirement. However, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA
) is fast becoming a reliable diagnostic modality for occlusive cerebr
ovascular diseases. The purpose of this study is to assess the accurac
y of MRA compared with conventional angiography. Methods Thirty-nine p
atients (23 children and 16 adults) with moyamoya disease confirmed by
conventional angiography (78 side views) were examined with MRA (thre
e-dimensional time-of-flight technique with a 256x256 or 256x512 matri
x). T-1- and T-2-weighted MR images were also taken. Results The steno
tic or occlusive change at the carotid fork was clearly revealed by MR
A, which correlated well with conventional angiography (83% good corre
lation, 17% overestimation). Apparent moyamoya vessels were clearly sh
own as a signal void on the MR image and fine unusual vessels on MRA,
particularly in children with moyamoya disease (82%). However, small m
oyamoya vessels were poorly shown on both MR images and MRA, particula
rly in adults (63%). Conclusions MRA can be an alternative to conventi
onal angiography in typical moyamoya disease cases (the bilateral type
of moyamoya disease in children). However, in the early or the end st
ages of moyamoya disease, diagnosis by means of MRA should be carefull
y evaluated.