The typification of the 109 names of lichens described by Linnaeus is
discussed; 50 lectotypes, 24 epitypes and eight neotypes are newly des
ignated. All written sources of which we are aware have been consulted
, including original manuscripts. The relevant specimens in Linnaeus'
lichen herbarium (LINN) have been carefully evaluated. All these eleme
nts are discussed, as well as the validity of previous typifications.
Most names (72.5%) can be typified in a way that avoids any changes in
their current interpretation, but proposals for conservation are nece
ssary for 17 species names if their current usage is to be upheld. Six
Linnaean names which have not been in use for a long time are treated
as species non satis notae since no original material has been traced
and the protologues are too vague to allow the species names to be id
entified with certainty. They will be proposed for rejection under Art
. 56 of the Tokyo Code together with five names-lichen cornucopioides,
Lichen fahlunensis, L. plicatus, L. rangiferinus var. sylvaticus and
Mucor lichenoides-the typification of which has unfortunate nomenclatu
ral consequences.