N. Pokrajac et F. Culo, MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTION TESTS IN PHYSIOLOGY - A PRELIMINARY ATTEMPT TO APPLY THE MINIMUM PASS LEVEL, Medical education, 28(5), 1994, pp. 409-417
At the mid-term test in Part I Physiology at the University of Zagreb
the students (n = 280) were graded by our standard pass level (SPL) ar
bitrarily set at 54% correct answers (SPL = 0.54). The test consisted
of 50 items of the one best answer type. Items were selected from the
pool by one examiner to conform, by his judgement, to the predetermine
d SPL. Post hoc the minimum pass level (MPL) was assessed independentl
y by eight examiners and an MPL value of 0.60 for the whole test was o
btained. The original Nedelsky scale was used in assessment of MPL but
for statistical analysis the data was expressed as log(1/MPL) to line
arize the scale of measurements and to reduce the variances. The data
showed a large difference between examiners in their assessment of MPL
. Nevertheless, the average log(1/MPL) value of individual items showe
d a significant negative linear relationship with the item difficulty
indices as calculated from student's answers, indicating that despite
the large heterogenity in assessment the average item log(1/MPL) may b
e acceptable as a reasonable prediction of item difficulty. Finally, '
subtests' were formed from the whole test by grouping items according
to their log(1/MPL) value. The passing rate at these subtests was foun
d to be identical despite the fact that they considerably differed in
their MPL values. Therefore, the MPL value seems to be useful in setti
ng objective standards for the decision of pass or fail, even when the
MPL was assessed in a very heterogenous way.