MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTION TESTS IN PHYSIOLOGY - A PRELIMINARY ATTEMPT TO APPLY THE MINIMUM PASS LEVEL

Authors
Citation
N. Pokrajac et F. Culo, MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTION TESTS IN PHYSIOLOGY - A PRELIMINARY ATTEMPT TO APPLY THE MINIMUM PASS LEVEL, Medical education, 28(5), 1994, pp. 409-417
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Education, Scientific Disciplines
Journal title
ISSN journal
03080110
Volume
28
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
409 - 417
Database
ISI
SICI code
0308-0110(1994)28:5<409:MQTIP->2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
At the mid-term test in Part I Physiology at the University of Zagreb the students (n = 280) were graded by our standard pass level (SPL) ar bitrarily set at 54% correct answers (SPL = 0.54). The test consisted of 50 items of the one best answer type. Items were selected from the pool by one examiner to conform, by his judgement, to the predetermine d SPL. Post hoc the minimum pass level (MPL) was assessed independentl y by eight examiners and an MPL value of 0.60 for the whole test was o btained. The original Nedelsky scale was used in assessment of MPL but for statistical analysis the data was expressed as log(1/MPL) to line arize the scale of measurements and to reduce the variances. The data showed a large difference between examiners in their assessment of MPL . Nevertheless, the average log(1/MPL) value of individual items showe d a significant negative linear relationship with the item difficulty indices as calculated from student's answers, indicating that despite the large heterogenity in assessment the average item log(1/MPL) may b e acceptable as a reasonable prediction of item difficulty. Finally, ' subtests' were formed from the whole test by grouping items according to their log(1/MPL) value. The passing rate at these subtests was foun d to be identical despite the fact that they considerably differed in their MPL values. Therefore, the MPL value seems to be useful in setti ng objective standards for the decision of pass or fail, even when the MPL was assessed in a very heterogenous way.