In recent years there have been. numerous randomized and nonrandomized
studies conducted to assess the efficacy of hyperthermia combined wit
h either radiation therapy or chemotherapy especially in the treatment
of superficially seated malignant tumors. The major impact of hyperth
ermia is currently on loco-regional control of tumor. Heat mag be dire
ctly cytotoxic to tumor cells or inhibit repair of both sublethal and
potentially lethal damage after radiation. These effects are augmented
by the physiological conditions in tumor which lead to states of acid
osis and hypoxia. Blood flow is often impaired in tumor relative to no
rmal tissue, and hyperthermia mag lead to a further decrease in blood
now and augment heat-sensitivity. Three major areas of clinical invest
igation have borne the greatest fruit for hyperthermia as adjunctive t
herapy to radiation therapy. These include recurrent and primary breas
t lesions, melanoma, and head and neck neoplasms. Thermal enhancement
ratio was increased in all cases and is estimated to be 1.4 for neck n
odes, 1.5 for breast and 2 for malignant melanoma. In general, the mos
t important prognostic factors for complete response are radiation dos
e, tumor size and minimal thermal parameters (minimal thermal dose (t(
43min)), mean minimal temperature (T-min) or T-90, i.e., temperature-e
xceeded by 90% of thermal sensors). The number of heat fractions admin
istered per week appear to have no bearing on the overall response, wh
ich may be indicative of the effects of thermotolerance. The total num
ber of heat fractions delivered also appears irrelevant provided adequ
ate heat is delivered in one or two sessions. The major prognostic fac
tors for the duration of local control are tumor histology, concurrent
radiation therapy dose, tumor depth T-min.