H. Tropp et al., POWER OUTPUT FOR WHEELCHAIR DRIVING ON A TREADMILL COMPARED WITH ARM CRANK ERGOMETRY, British journal of sports medicine, 31(1), 1997, pp. 41-44
Objectives-The limiting factors with regard to power output available
for wheelchair ambulation have not been identified. The aim of the pre
sent study was to correlate power output during wheelchair driving wit
h (i) power output and oxygen uptake during arm crank ergometry and (i
i) arm muscle strength. Methods-Eleven disabled men were examined for
maximal power output (POmax) during wheelchair driving on a treadmill
and during arm crank ergometry. Oxygen uptake (Vo(2)) was recorded at
submaximal and maximal arm crank ergometry in all men and during subma
ximal wheelchair driving on a treadmill in four men. Power output duri
ng wheelchair driving on a treadmill was measured. Static and dynamic
elbow muscle strength was measured isokinetically. Results-POmax was s
ignificantly lower (P < 0.001) for wheelchair driving (109 (31) W; mea
n (SD)) than for arm ergometry (163 (49) W). There was a significant c
orrelation between PO,, for arm crank ergometry and wheelchair driving
(r = 0.73). There was no correlation between PO,, and elbow strength.
The mechanical efficiency was constant for the different levels on th
e arm crank ergometry test. The submaximal testing showed a consistent
ly lower mechanical efficiency for wheelchair driving than for arm cra
nk ergometry. Conclusions-It is suggested that the lower level of powe
r output for wheelchair driving is fully explained by the lower mechan
ical efficiency. Any improvement in power output available for ambulat
ion must be based on wheelchair ergonomics.