AGRICULTURAL JOURNALISTS ASSESSMENTS OF PRINT COVERAGE OF AGRICULTURAL NEWS

Citation
A. Reisner et G. Walter, AGRICULTURAL JOURNALISTS ASSESSMENTS OF PRINT COVERAGE OF AGRICULTURAL NEWS, Rural sociology, 59(3), 1994, pp. 525-537
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00360112
Volume
59
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
525 - 537
Database
ISI
SICI code
0036-0112(1994)59:3<525:AJAOPC>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Critics of agricultural news claim farm media and mass media coverage of agriculture is systematically distorted, a condition that could ser iously affect the agricultural information system. A national survey u sed agricultural journalists as expert judges to asses how well three types of print journalists cover agricultural news. Their assessments indicated that mass media reporters who do not regularly cover agricul tural news tend to write agriculture stories that are superficial and stereotyped but not biased toward agricultural interests. Farm magazin e writers' stories are not superficial or stereotyped, but writers are uncritical of agriculture, biased toward agroindustry, and overlook i mportant social and environmental issues. Newspaper farm beat reporter s are closer to farm magazine writers in not trivializing agriculture and closer to general newspaper reporters in avoiding close ties with industry. Both farmers and public thus receive biased and fragmented r eporting that may polarize their views on current agricultural issues. Even if reporters are aware of critical shortcomings in their coverag e, improvement may require reduction in structural constraints on stor y choice.