BACKGROUND: Commencing in 1984, we initiated a head and neck service s
urgical database that included a classification system for neck dissec
tion. The aim was to reduce tile confusion in terminology resulting fr
om growing interest in modifications of conventional radical neck diss
ection. METHODS: We considered a neck dissection as radical when four
or five lymph node levels were excised; this included patients who had
an otherwise classical neck dissection for supraglottic larynx or hyp
opharyngeal cancer sparing level 1. Lymph-node levels removed, nonlymp
hatic structures preserved, and excised nonlymphatic structures not or
dinarily included in a classical radical neck dissection were all spec
ified by the operating surgeon. We defined as a selective neck dissect
ion any lymphadenectomy that encompassed no more than three nodal leve
ls, usually supraomohyoid (levels 1, 2, 3), or jugular (levels 2, 3, 4
). We defined as a limited neck dissection any lymphadenectomy that in
volved removal of no more than two nodal levels. RESULTS: At the 10-ye
ar mark, this database of 10,650 patients now includes 2,635 lymphaden
ectomies in 2,426 patients, the precise extent of which is accurately
described in each patient. CONCLUSIONS: The current classification of
neck dissection does not cover all possibilities. If we define as radi
cal those lymphadenectomies that resect four or five nodal levels and
specify structures preserved or additional nonlymphatic structures sac
rificed, we allow for the possibility that some procedures may be both
modified and extended. Selective would describe the standard, three-l
evel dissections (eg, supraomohyoid or jugalar node dissections), and
the term limited would be introduced to indicate a neck dissection tha
t involves removal of no more than two nodal levels. Such a three-tier
ed classification would more accurately reflect the time and effort in
volved and provide a more equitable basis for reimbursement.