Ca. Manthous et Ga. Schmidt, RESISTIVE PRESSURE OF A CONDENSER HUMIDIFIER IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS, Critical care medicine, 22(11), 1994, pp. 1792-1795
Objectives: Heat and moisture exchangers (or ''nose'' humidifiers) are
commonly used to aid in the humidification of inspired gases of mecha
nically ventilated patients. These devices add resistance to the venti
lator circuit that has heretofore not been quantified in critically il
l patients. Accordingly, we determined the resistive pressures associa
ted with new and old (but < 24 hrs in the circuit) humidifiers in 23 c
ritically ill, mechanically ventilated patients.Design: Prospective st
udy. Setting: Adult medical and surgical intensive care units at a uni
versity center. Patients: Twenty-three critically ill, mechanically ve
ntilated patients using a condenser humidifier between the wye and the
endotracheal tube. Interventions: Peak and plateau airway pressures w
ere determined with the humidifier in place. These measurements were r
epeated without the humidifier, then after insertion of a fresh humidi
fier into the circuit. In five patients, measurements were repeated af
ter humidifiers had remained in place for a full 24 hrs. Measurements
and Main Results: The new humidifiers increased the resistive pressure
of the ventilator circuit by 4.8 +/- 2.6 cm H2O compared with no humi
difier (p < .01) and had a mean resistance of 4.2 +/- 1.5 cm H2O/L/sec
. Old humidifiers increased resistive pressure by 6.3 +/- 3.6 cm H2O c
ompared with no humidifier (p < .01) and had a mean resistance of 5.1
+/- 1.8 cm H2O/L/sec. The resistive pressure doubled from 3.4 +/- 1.2
to 7.0 +/- 1.8 cm H2O (p < .01) in five patients in whom the humidifie
rs were left in the ventilator circuit for a full 24 hrs. Conclusions:
The humidifier adds a significant resistance to the ventilator circui
t which may lead to incorrect assessment of respiratory system mechani
cs, to inappropriate therapy (e.g., bronchodilators), or to difficulty
in weaning from mechanical ventilation.