Ca. Vandevoort et al., BREAKTHROUGHS IN ANDROLOGY - HYALURONIC-ACID ENHANCES THE ZONA-PELLUCIDA-INDUCED ACROSOME REACTION OF MACAQUE SPERM, Journal of andrology, 18(1), 1997, pp. 1-5
Hyaluronic acid (HA) not only surrounds the zona pellucida as part of
the cumulus matrix but also is present throughout the zona pellucida a
nd the perivitelline space of many mammalian oocytes. However, most in
vitro techniques to study sperm-oocyte interaction eliminate HA from
the oocyte through enzymatic digestion and/or do not expose sperm to H
A prior to zona pellucida binding. This study explores the effect of p
reincubation of sperm or oocytes with HA on sperm-zona pellucida bindi
ng and subsequent acrosome reaction of bound sperm. Cynomolgus macaque
semen was washed, incubated, chemically capacitated with dibutryl cyc
lic adenosine monophosphate (dbcAMP) and caffeine, and sperm-zona pell
ucida binding assays were performed. In one experiment, sperm were pre
treated with HA (100 mu g/ml) during the last 10 minutes of the 30-min
ute period for chemical capacitation. In another experiment, only the
oocytes were preincubated in the media containing HA. In the third exp
eriment, gametes were exposed to HA for 10 minutes after sperm had bee
n allowed to bind to zonae pellucida. The preincubation of either sper
m or zonae pellucida with HA enhanced the percentage of bound sperm th
at were acrosome reacted. However, HA did not affect the number of spe
rm bound to zonae pellucida. When sperm already bound to the zona pell
ucida were exposed to HA, there was no increase in the percentage of b
ound acrosome-reacted sperm. The HA enhancement of the acrosome reacti
on of sperm bound to the zona pellucida shown in this study required l
ess than 1 minute of sperm exposure to HA-treated zonae during the zon
a binding process. However, this enhancement was observed only if the
HA exposure preceded sperm-zona binding. This result suggests that HA
is interacting with the sperm surface, possibly via a receptor, at the
time of initiation of the acrosome reaction. It is unlikely that the
effects noted in the current experiments were the result of motility r
etention or improvement because the full enhancement of the acrosome r
eaction was observed when only the oocytes were pretreated with HA.