Kc. Thomopoulos et al., THE EFFECT OF ENDOSCOPIC INJECTION THERAPY ON THE CLINICAL OUTCOME OFPATIENTS WITH BENIGN PEPTIC-ULCER BLEEDING, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 32(3), 1997, pp. 212-216
Background: Our aim was to investigate the effect of endoscopic inject
ion therapy on the clinical outcome of patients with benign peptic ulc
er bleeding. Methods: In this study 1203 patients admitted with peptic
ulcer bleeding over a 5-year period (January 1987 to April 1991) befo
re endoscopic therapy and 1028 patients admitted with peptic ulcer ble
eding after introduction of endoscopic therapy (May 1991 to March 1996
) were assessed. Endoscopic therapy was performed in all patients with
active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels during emergency endos
copy with injection of adrenaline, 1:10,000 in 0.9% saline. Results: T
he introduction of injection therapy was associated with a reduction i
n transfusion requirements (from 5.1 +/- 2.6 to 3.4 +/- 1.8 units), ho
spitalization days (from 10.8 +/- 6.5 to 7.8 +/- 5.1 days), surgical i
nterventions (from 50.6% to 23.6%), and mortality (from 12.9% to 4.6%)
in patients with active bleeding or non-bleeding visible vessels (P <
0.05) but remained unchanged in the rest. Patients with gastric ulcer
had a more pronounced reduction in emergency surgical haemostasis and
mortality than patients with duodenal ulcer. There were no deaths or
procedure-related complications. Conclusion: Endoscopic injection ther
apy with adrenaline/saline is a simple, low-cost, and safe method that
improves the clinical outcome and reduces the mortality in patients w
ith peptic ulcer bleeding.