Rl. Sheley et Ll. Larson, COMPARATIVE GROWTH AND INTERFERENCE BETWEEN CHEATGRASS AND YELLOW STARTHISTLE SEEDLINGS, Journal of range management, 47(6), 1994, pp. 470-474
Annual grasslands in the Pacific Northwest are being invaded by Eurasi
an weeds, such as yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.). Plan
t-plant interactions influence community dynamics and plant establishm
ent. The objectives of this study were to quantify the effects of inte
rference between seedlings of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) and yell
ow starthistle and to compare growth of isolated individuals of these
species. Isolated individuals and addition series mixtures with total
stand densities ranging from 20-20,000 plants m-2 were grown in an env
ironmental chamber (10-degrees-C, 12-hour daylength). Individuals were
harvested on 4-day intervals between 10 and 46 days, and mixtures wer
e harvested 37 days after planting. Shoot weight, root weight, leaf ar
ea, and total root length of isolated individuals were similar. Yellow
starthistle roots penetrated deeper into the soil than did cheatgrass
roots 22 days after planting. Intraspecific interference was greater
than interspecific interference for both species, and resource partiti
oning via rooting depth was evident. The yellow starthistle root:shoot
ratio and the cheatgrass lower (below 200 mm): upper (above 200 mm) r
oot ratio increased with increasing densities. Yellow starthistle and
cheatgrass minimize interspecific interference as seedlings through di
fferential growth and rooting depth. Invasion of cheatgrass rangelands
by yellow starthistle increase resource partitioning and reduce our a
bility to revegetate rangelands by conventional means.