PLASTICITY IN METAMORPHIC TRAITS OF NATTERJACK TADPOLES - THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF DENSITY AND POND DURATION

Authors
Citation
M. Tejedo et R. Reques, PLASTICITY IN METAMORPHIC TRAITS OF NATTERJACK TADPOLES - THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF DENSITY AND POND DURATION, Oikos, 71(2), 1994, pp. 295-304
Citations number
64
Categorie Soggetti
Zoology,Ecology
Journal title
OikosACNP
ISSN journal
00301299
Volume
71
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
295 - 304
Database
ISI
SICI code
0030-1299(1994)71:2<295:PIMTON>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Plasticity in developmental time and size at metamorphosis were studie d in natural and experimental populations of natterjack toad tadpoles (Bufo calamita), a species which breeds in temporary ponds of variable duration. Amount of rainfall directly affected pond hydroperiod and l arval density through an increase in the number of spawning females. A s both factors directly affected larval period and thus metamorphic su ccess, we performed a factorial field experiment to examine the respon se of developmental rates to drought regime and its interaction with p opulation density, by controlling pond duration, larval density and fo od level. Timing of metamorphosis was affected by larval density and f ood level. However, the response among larvae due to pond duration was not additive. At low larval density, tadpoles raised in short duratio n ponds exhibited shorter larval periods than in long duration ponds. In constrast, plasticity in developmental rates due to pond duration w as less marked at high larval densities and no difference in length of larval period was found. This may be the result of higher competition levels in short duration ponds through an increase in actual larval d ensity because of decreasing water level and lower metamorphic rates. This higher competitive stress was also evident by smaller metamorphic size in short ponds. At low densities tadpoles in longer duration pon ds exhibited no additional growth, indicating that tadpoles that remai ned for a longer period did not achieve larger metamorphic size. This outcome does not support an adaptive explanation of developmental plas ticity that merely may be the consequence of expressing a single progr am of development in different habitats.