What kinds of knowledge underlie the use of language and how is this k
nowledge acquired? Linguists equate knowing a language with knowing a
grammar. Classic ''poverty of the stimulus'' arguments suggest that gr
ammar identification is an intractable inductive problem and that acqu
isition is possible only because children possess innate knowledge of
grammatical structure. An alternative view is emerging from studies of
statistical and probabilistic aspects of language, connectionist mode
ls, and the learning: capacities of infants. This approach emphasizes
continuity between how language is acquired and how it is used. It ret
ains the idea that innate capacities constrain language learning, but
calls into question whether they include knowledge of grammatical stru
cture.