A number of generalizations of the expected utility preference functio
nal are estimated using experimentally generated data involving 100 pa
irwise choice questions repeated on two separate occasions. Likelihood
ratio tests are conducted to investigate the statistical superiority
of the various generalizations, and the Akaike information criterion i
s used to distinguish between them. The economic superiority of the va
rious generalizations is also explored and the paper concludes that, f
or many subjects, the superiority of several of the generalizations is
not established.