Mw. Vannier et al., CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS - DIAGNOSTIC-IMAGING WITH 3-DIMENSIONAL CT PRESENTATION, American journal of neuroradiology, 15(10), 1994, pp. 1861-1869
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
PURPOSE: To measure diagnostic performance and preference of two three
-dimensional CT reconstruction modalities (voxel-gradient and surface-
projection) displayed two ways (conventional and unwrapped) in cranios
ynostosis confirmed by surgical inspection and histologic analysis of
resected sutures. METHODS: High-resolution 2-mm contiguous CT sections
were obtained and three-dimensional reconstruction images generated f
or 25 infants and children with skull deformities before surgical trea
tment of craniosynostosis. Two pediatric radiologists and two neurorad
iologists first ranked images by their own preferences for diagnostic
use. Then they diagnosed craniosynostosis from images presented in ran
dom order and blinded. The standard of reference was inspection during
surgery and histologic evaluation of excised sutures. Finally, review
ers repeated their subjective preference tests. RESULTS: The least exp
erienced radiologist had 100% sensitivity for all imaging modalities a
nd specificities ranging from 43% to 83%. The two most experienced rad
iologists performed nearly identically, with sensitivities of 96% and
specificities of 100%, After performing diagnostic tasks using all ima
ge types, all radiologists preferred conventional surface projections.
CONCLUSION: Experienced readers can achieve nearly perfect diagnostic
performance using the latest three-dimensional CT reconstruction imag
es, making it a contribution to the diagnostic process. Although perfo
rmance is nearly identical for all modalities, readers strongly prefer
conventionally presented surface-projection images.