PURPOSE: To compare rotational angiography with conventional digital s
ubtraction angiography in the assessment of cerebral aneurysms. METHOD
S: Conventional digital subtraction angiography and rotational angiogr
aphy were compared in 57 patients investigated for the preoperative di
agnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage and in 13 patients after surgery. I
mages were compared for location, visibility of the aneurysmal neck, v
ascular branch anatomy, projection, size, presence of spasm, and shape
of the aneurysm. RESULTS: Rotational angiography was superior to the
digital angiogram in assessing aneurysms and vascular anatomy in the f
ollowing percentage of cases: 12% for location, 46% for the presence o
f a neck, 32% in the assessment of branch anatomy, 19% for projection,
12% for size, 3.5% for spasm, and 19% for shape. After surgery, rotat
ional angiography more clearly demonstrated the presence or absence of
a neck in 69% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Relational angiography often
allows better visualization of vascular anatomy and therefore improve
s the angiographic assessment of aneurysms when compared with conventi
onal digital subtraction angiography, making it an excellent adjunct i
n the investigation of subarachnoid hemorrhage. The lack of subtractio
n artifacts from the surgical clips and multiple angles of view also a
llow better assessment of the presence or absence of a residual neck i
n postoperative cases.