THE PROTEIN-QUALITY OF SOME ENTERAL PRODUCTS IS INFERIOR TO THAT OF CASEIN AS ASSESSED BY RAT GROWTH METHODS AND DIGESTIBILITY-CORRECTED AMINO-ACID SCORES
G. Sarwar et Rw. Peace, THE PROTEIN-QUALITY OF SOME ENTERAL PRODUCTS IS INFERIOR TO THAT OF CASEIN AS ASSESSED BY RAT GROWTH METHODS AND DIGESTIBILITY-CORRECTED AMINO-ACID SCORES, The Journal of nutrition, 124(11), 1994, pp. 2223-2232
Protein digestibility and quality of six enteral nutrition products so
ld in Canada were studied by rat balance and growth methods. Casein L-methionine, 0.2 g/100 g diet (control) and six enteral products (fre
eze-dried) were fed as the sole source of protein in diets containing
8.61-9.12 g/100 g protein (N x 6.25) to weanling and 18 mo-old rats fo
r a period of 2 and 1 wk, respectively. A protein-free diet was also i
ncluded in the feeding studies to permit calculations of true protein
digestibility and net protein ratio values. Values for true digestibil
ity of protein as determined in old rats for the control diet and the
test products were 95 and 89-93%, respectively. Compared with old rats
, protein digestibility values were 5-7 percentage units higher in you
ng rats. The 2-wk relative protein efficiency ratio (42-56%) or the re
lative net protein ratio (61-74%) of the enteral products were conside
rably lower compared to, those of the control (100). Supplementation o
f an enteral product with cysteine, cysteine + tryptophan, cysteine threonine oi cysteine + tryptophan + threonine caused significant impr
ovement in protein quality; suggesting that the product was limiting i
n these three amino acids. The protein digestibility-corrected amino a
cid scores for the enteral products were 43-46, 69-75 and 86-93% by us
ing whole egg, casein and the FAG-WHO (1991) pattern as reference prot
eins, respectively. The results indicate that these enteral products a
re inferior to casein in protein quality.