Me. Losi et al., BIOREMEDIATION OF CHROMATE-CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER BY REDUCTION AND PRECIPITATION IN SURFACE SOILS, Journal of environmental quality, 23(6), 1994, pp. 1141-1150
A cost-effective method is needed for removing chromate from cooling w
ater blowdown, wastewater effluent, and contaminated groundwater. Expe
riments were conducted to determine the effectiveness of treating Cr-c
ontaminated water by using the water for irrigation, and that reductio
n of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) would occur in a soil amended with organic matt
er and irrigated to promote low oxidation/reduction status. The Cr(III
) would then precipitate as oxides and hydroxides, and be immobilized
and rendered plant unavailable. Samples of a field soil (mixed, thermi
c Typic Torripsamments) overlying a contaminated groundwater site were
placed in pots and irrigated for 20 wk with water containing 1000 mu
g L(-1) Cr(VI). Treatments included plants (alfalfa; Medicago sativa L
.) vs. no plants, each at three organic matter loadings - 0, 12, and 5
0 Mg ha(-1) dried cattle manure (0, 5.5, and 21.8 g manure kg(-1) soil
). The drainage waters were collected weekly and analyzed for total Cr
, Cr(VI), pH, dissolved O-2 dissolved Organic C, and electrical conduc
tivity. The removal percentages of Cr(VI) from the enriched water rang
ed from 51 to 98% and increased with increasing organic matter loading
. Chromium concentrations in the drainage water were consistently <50
mu g L(-1) in the organic-amended soil. Daily irrigation yielded lower
drainage water Cr concentrations than weekly irrigation (at a constan
t weekly volume) due to increased residence time of the water in the b
ioactive zone. Chromate adsorption accounted for <1% of the total immo
bilized Cr and the amount taken up by the alfalfa shoots was <0.5% of
the total added. This method shows promise as a cost-effective treatme
nt for Cr-contaminated groundwater.