Ss. Entman et al., THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MALPRACTICE CLAIMS HISTORY AND SUBSEQUENT OBSTETRIC CARE, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 272(20), 1994, pp. 1588-1591
Objective.-To determine the relationship between prior malpractice cla
ims experience and the quality of clinical obstetric care. Design.-His
torical cohort study of obstetricians, classified by their prior malpr
actice claims experience, with blinded review of medical records from
their practices 5 to 10 years later. Setting.-Florida obstetricians wh
o lost, settled, or defended malpractice claims between 1977 and 1983
and who were still practicing obstetrics in 1987. Main Outcome Measure
s.-Objective and subjective assessment of quality of clinical care of
patients attended by obstetricians with different histories of malprac
tice claims. Results.-No differences were found in any of the objectiv
e or subjective measures of the quality of clinical care provided to p
atients of obstetricians who were classified into one of four groups a
ccording to their prior claims history. Conclusions.-No relationship w
as found between prior malpractice claims experience and the technical
quality of practice by Florida obstetricians. Strategies that attempt
to identify physicians at risk for future clinical errors by using da
ta on prior malpractice claims (such as the National Practitioner Data
Bank) may be misjudging the likelihood that substandard clinical care
will be provided by physicians with prior claims.