Changes in temple labor investment and sacrificial offerings indicate
that the rise in religious authority of the Hawaiian chiefly hierarchy
correlates with an increase in political centralization and the inten
sifying role of the chief as divine intermediary through time. Initial
ly, temples were small public courts akin to traditional Polynesian sh
rines used to reaffirm genealogical ties. During a period of interneci
ne warfare and political instability and conflict in the 15th century
A.D., temples became extremely large, a practical symbol of the burgeo
ning power of elites as they used ritual labor obligations to reaffirm
chiefly genealogical relationships and enhance class cooperation. Aft
er island unification in the 16th century, chiefly religious activity
shifted to sacrificial ceremonies and the consumption of surplus goods
and food-stuffs as a result of status competition. By the time of Eur
opean contact in the 19th century, divinely sanctified rituals associa
ted with war and levying taxes were instituted to enhance the status a
nd power of the paramount chief through personal displays of material
wealth. The Hawaiian case appears to follow a common trajectory among
complex societies, where religious authority is increasingly expressed
through the political economy, and serves as a contextual model of a
complex chiefdom undergoing rapid political stratification.