Drawing on Anscombe's (1960) description of intention as a language ga
me, this article explores the negotiation of ''theories of responsibil
ity'' (O'Barr & Conley, 1985) in informal legal narratives. Using exam
ples of conversation drawn from a mediation session, I show how intent
ions, as discursive formations, are central not only to both narrative
structure and interaction sequences but to the politics of subject po
sition in discourse as well; the management of subject position is dis
cussed in terms of critical coherence points-locations in the discours
e from which intentions are conjointly constructed and contested.