ASSESSING INTERNAL HURRICANE DAMAGE TO STANDING PINE POLETIMBER

Citation
Td. Faust et al., ASSESSING INTERNAL HURRICANE DAMAGE TO STANDING PINE POLETIMBER, Wood and fiber science, 26(4), 1994, pp. 536-545
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Materiales Science, Textiles","Materials Science, Paper & Wood",Forestry
Journal title
ISSN journal
07356161
Volume
26
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
536 - 545
Database
ISI
SICI code
0735-6161(1994)26:4<536:AIHDTS>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Two test methods were used to assess type, location, and degree of int ernal stem damage to standing pine poletimber (5.0-8.9 in. diameter at breast height, DBH) caused by Hurricane Hugo. A total of sixty trees [15 from each of the four Forest Inventory Analysis (FIA) damage class es] were taken from three sites in the Francis Marion National Forest. Internal damage was expected in the form of ring shake and compressio n failure. Five stem sections (A through E) were taken from each tree at different heights. From each section, specimens were cut from four quadrants (Tension, Compression, Left, and Right) relative to the wind direction during the storm for toughness and tension perpendicular to the grain testing. A total of 2,147 toughness specimens were tested. A total of 273 specimens were tested in tension perpendicular to the g rain. The dependent variables analyzed were toughness, tension strengt h, and specific gravity with FIA damage class as the whole plot factor . Although there was an increasing trend in toughness from Damage Clas s 1 through 4, analysis of variance showed damage class not to be a si gnificant effect on toughness. Stem section and quadrant were found to be significant on toughness. Much of the variation in toughness due t o stem section may be attributed to the effects of juvenile wood diffe rences with tree height. Also a high occurrence of reaction wood in Qu adrant C (side of the tree away from the wind) would contribute to low er toughness strength. Similarly, specific gravity (SG) values showed an overall increase from Damage Class 1 through 4. Specific gravity of Damage Class 1 and 4 was found to be significantly different. Statist ical analysis showed no apparent relationship between damage class and tension strength perpendicular to the grain. The lack of evidence for internal damage is relatively unimportant compared to the evidence of change in the wood properties from the formation of reaction wood. In leaning stems (FIA Damage Classes 2, 3, 4), reaction wood should cont inue to form. In straight trees, reaction wood formed in the two growt h seasons following the storm, but it is unclear whether it will conti nue to form. The results lead to the conclusion that stands with leani ng stems should be harvested and replanted.