Ag. Aprikian et al., EXPERIENCE WITH NEOADJUVANT DIETHYLSTILBESTROL AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER, British Journal of Urology, 74(5), 1994, pp. 630-636
Objective To report our experience with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy
and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in patients with locally ad
vanced prostate cancer. Patients and methods Fifty-five patients with
prostatic adenocarcinoma (18 clinical stage B2/3, 27 clinical stage C,
and 10 clinical stage DO) were treated with diethylstilboestrol (DES)
3 mg/d (median time 12 weeks, range 5-36) followed by pelvic lymph no
de dissection and planned RRP. Clinical response was monitored bi-week
ly with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), serum acid phosphatase
and digital rectal examination. Results The median pre-treatment serum
PSA was 20.4 ng/ml (range 1.2-620). The median post-treatment, pre-op
erative serum PSA was 0.4 ng/ml. Twenty-seven (49%), 41 (75%) and 54 (
98%) patients had serum PSA levels that were undetectable, <1.0 ng/ml
and <4.0 ng/ml respectively. In 15 patients, transrectal ultrasound me
asurement of prostatic volume changes was performed, and all demonstra
ted prostate volume reduction (median reduction 35%, range 18-45). All
55 patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy, with 47 (85%) undergoin
g RRP. Of the eight patients not undergoing RRP, three had negative ly
mph nodes but prostate resection was not deemed feasible and five had
nodal metastases as determined by frozen section analysis. Final patho
logical stage revealed the following distribution: organ confined tumo
urs, 18 (33%): capsular perforation with negative surgical margins, se
minal vesicles and lymph nodes, seven (13%); seminal vesicle and/or ma
rgin involvement with negative lymph nodes, 18 (33%); lymph node metas
tases, 12 (22%). Neither pre-therapy serum PSA nor serum PSA response
was predictive of final pathological stage. With a median follow-up in
ternal of 26 months (range 12-49), 21 patients (38%) bane undetectable
serum PSA without adjuvant therapy. Conclusions Our results indicate
that despite clinical evidence suggestive of downstaging, the majority
of patients with locally advanced prostatic carcinoma managed with ne
oadjuvant DES and RRP continue to bane pathological evidence of extrap
rostatic carcinoma.