S. Opjordsmoen et Sd. Fossa, QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN PATIENTS TREATED FOR PENILE CANCER - A FOLLOW-UP-STUDY, British Journal of Urology, 74(5), 1994, pp. 652-657
Objectives To study the long-term psychosocial wellbeing of patients f
ollowing successful physical treatment for cancer of the penis. Patien
ts and methods Thirty patients (median age at follow-up 57 years, rang
e 28-75) were followed up for a median of 80 months after treatment fo
r penile cancer (local excision/laser beam treatment, 5; radiotherapy,
12; partial penectomy, 9; total penectomy, 4). They underwent a semi-
structured interview and completed the Impact of Events Scale, General
Health Questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ C-30 questionnaire. Global sca
les for measuring sexual function, subjective well-being and social ac
tivity were constructed and found reliable and valid. Results There wa
s a strong correlation between the well-being scale and the EORTC scal
es for overall quality of life and psychological distress. Patients tr
eated with partial or total penectomy had a worse outcome with regard
to sexual function than patients treated conservatively, but there was
no difference in the other domains of quality of life, indicating tha
t even the more radically treated patients usually adapted adequately.
Half of the individuals had mental symptoms at follow-up, and these p
atients were less satisfied and showed less social activity. Seven men
reported that, if asked again, they would choose treatment with lower
long-term survival to increase the chance of remaining sexually poten
t, but the majority gave priority to higher long-term survival. Conclu
sion Before treatment of penile cancer, physicians should thoroughly d
iscuss the expected outcome and consequences of the different treatmen
t options with the patient. Psychosocial treatment might be helpful fo
r patients with mental symptoms.