Rd. White et al., THORACIC AORTIC DISEASE - EVALUATION USING A SINGLE MRA VOLUME SERIES, Journal of computer assisted tomography, 18(6), 1994, pp. 843-854
Objective: Use of MRA for thoracic aortic disease (TAD) evaluation has
been limited. This report describes an initial experience with TAD ev
aluation using a single MRA volume series. Materials and Methods: A si
ngle volume series, based on sequential 2D TOF MRA, was acquired in 30
cases (28 with suspected TAD and 2 normals). Each series was processe
d using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and maximum intensity project
ion (MIP); resulting tomographic (one base and two MPR) and MIP sets w
ere blindly interpreted by four reviewers to detect TAD and, if presen
t, to diagnose its specific form. For cases incorrectly interpreted, t
he standard MR images were subsequently interpreted. Results: The TAD
categories included aneurysm (n = 13), dissection (n = 9), and arch an
omalies (n = 5). Sensitivities were high for TAD overall (89-100%) and
TAD in ascending and descending portions; sensitivities were lower fo
r TAD of the arch (two of four reviewers greater than or equal to 90%
for TAD overall and descending TAD). Specificities for TAD overall had
a wider range (67-100%), but were high for ascending, arch, and desce
nding portions (three to four of four reviewers greater than or equal
to 90% for each). Sensitivities for aneurysms (69-92%) and dissections
overall (67-100%) were comparable, as they were in ascending and arch
portions; descending dissection was better detected than descending a
neurysm (two of four reviewers greater than or equal to 90% for ascend
ing or arch aneurysm and for descending dissection); overall specifici
ties (88-100 vs. 81-95%) and specificities in ascending, arch, and des
cending portions were also comparable (three to four of four reviewers
greater than or equal to 90% for both in each portion; two of four re
viewers greater than or equal to 90% for dissection overall). Each rev
iewer achieved greater than or equal to 70% diagnostic accuracy for TA
D (one of four reviewers = 85%); accuracies for each category were com
parable. Interpretation of standard MR images corrected all detection
and most diagnostic (greater than or equal to 63% errors.Conclusion: T
his initial experience with conventional TOF MRA for TAD evaluation is
encouraging, but it indicates the potential for advancements in data
acquisition and/or postprocessing.