A MINIMAL MODEL OF THE SINGLE CAPACITOR BIPHASIC DEFIBRILLATION WAVE-FORM

Authors
Citation
Mw. Kroll, A MINIMAL MODEL OF THE SINGLE CAPACITOR BIPHASIC DEFIBRILLATION WAVE-FORM, PACE, 17(11), 1994, pp. 1782-1792
Citations number
62
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System","Engineering, Biomedical
ISSN journal
01478389
Volume
17
Issue
11
Year of publication
1994
Part
1
Pages
1782 - 1792
Database
ISI
SICI code
0147-8389(1994)17:11<1782:AMMOTS>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
A quantitative model of the single capacitor biphasic defibrillation w aveform is proposed. The primary hypothesis of this model is that the first phase leaves a residual charge on the membranes of the unsynchro nized cells, which can then reinitiate fibrillation. The second phase diminishes this charge, reducing the potential for refibrillation. To suppress this potential refibrillation, a monophasic shock must be str ong enough to synchronize a critical mass of nearly 100% of the myocyt es. Since the biphasic waveform performs this protection function by r emoving the residual charge (with its second phase), its first phase m ay be of a lower strength than a monophasic shock of equivalent perfor mance. A quantitative model was developed to calculate the residual me mbrane voltage, V-m, assuming a capacitive membrane being alternately charged and discharged by the first and second phases, respectively. i t was further assumed that the amplitude of the first phase would be p redicted by a minimum value plus a term proportional to V-m(2). The mo del was evaluated on the pooled data of three relevant published studi es comparing biphasic waveforms. The model explained 79% of the varian ce in the first phase amplitude and predicted optimal durations for va rious defibrillator capacitances and electrode resistances. Assuming a first phase of optimal duration, the optimal second phase duration ap pears to be about 2.5 msec for all capacitances and resistances now se en clinically. Conclusion: The effectiveness of the single capacitor b iphasic waveform may be explained by the second phase ''burping'' of t he deleterious residual charge of the first phase that, in turn, reduc es the synchronization requirement and the amplitude requirements of t he first phase.