COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR OBTAINING PLANTAR PRESSURES IN NONPATHOLOGIC SUBJECTS

Citation
B. Meyersrice et al., COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR OBTAINING PLANTAR PRESSURES IN NONPATHOLOGIC SUBJECTS, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 84(10), 1994, pp. 499-504
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics
ISSN journal
87507315
Volume
84
Issue
10
Year of publication
1994
Pages
499 - 504
Database
ISI
SICI code
8750-7315(1994)84:10<499:CO3MFO>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine if pressure data, collected after taking one step or two steps, were similar to values obtained b y using the traditional midgait method. Ten healthy subjects, with a m ean age of 27 years, walked across a sensor platform sampling at 70 Hz . Each subject was randomly assigned to take one step, two steps, or m ultiple steps (midgait method) across the sensor platform. The results of the study indicate that the two-step method, in comparison with th e one-step method, provides pressure data more representative of the m idgait method, and different values for pressure and force will be obt ained, depending on the method of pressure data collection selected by the clinician.