Cj. Mcginn et al., THE ROLE OF CELL-CYCLE REDISTRIBUTION IN RADIOSENSITIZATION - IMPLICATIONS REGARDING THE MECHANISM OF FLUORODEOXYURIDINE RADIOSENSITIZATION, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 30(4), 1994, pp. 851-859
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Radiosensitization has previously been demonstrated in a huma
n colon cancer cell line (HT-29) following a 2 h exposure to low, clin
ically relevant concentrations (0.05-0.5 mu M) of fluorodeoxyuridine (
FdUrd) (15). The sensitizer enhancement ratio value (measured at 10% s
urvival) plateaued at approximate to 1.7 between 16 and 32 h following
removal of drug. Parallel studies investigating the effect of FdUrd o
n the distribution of cells throughout the cell cycle found that the p
ercentage of cells in early S-phase increased to approximate to 70% du
ring the same period that maximal radiosensitization was noted. As a f
ollow-up to these findings, experiments have been designed to investig
ate the contribution of this early S-phase delay to radiosensitization
. Methods and Materials: Synchronized populations of HT-29 cells have
been obtained with three separate techniques. Two involve the inductio
n of a reversible metaphase arrest (with high pressure N2O or colcemid
) followed by a shakeoff of mitotic cells. The third uses a plant amin
o acid, mimosine, to induce a reversible block at the G(1)/S boundary.
Flow cytometry was used to analyze the degree of synchrony based on b
romodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) uptake and propidium iodide (PI) staining. R
adiation survival curves were obtained on these synchronized populatio
ns to investigate changes in radiosensitivity through the cell cycle.
Additionally, levels of thymidylate synthase (TS), the primary target
of FdUrd cytotoxicity, were measured in each phase of the cell cycle u
sing the TS 106 monoclonal antibody against human TS. Results: Synchro
nization with mitotic shakeoff produced relatively pure populations of
cells in G(1); however, the degree of synchrony in early S-phase was
limited both by cells remaining in GI and by cells progressing into la
te S-phase. These techniques failed to reveal increased radiosensitivi
ty in early S-phase at 10% survival. An 18 h exposure to mimosine resu
lted in populations that more closely resembled the early S-phase enri
chment following FdUrd exposure and revealed increased radiosensitivit
y during early S-phase. TS levels were noted to be only 1.3 times high
er in S phase than in G(0)/G(1). Conclusion: Radiation survival data f
rom cells synchronized with mitotic shakeoff techniques suggest that e
arly S-phase delay is unlikely to be the primary mechansim of FdUrd ra
diosensitizatian. In contrast, the increased sensitivity seen in early
S-phase with mimosine synchronized cells is similar to that seen with
FdUrd. Although confounding biochemical pertubations cannot be ruled
out, these data continue to suggest an association between early S-pha
se enrichment and radiosensitization. The significance of TS inhibitio
n as a mechanism of FdUrd radiosensitization remains unclear.