COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF BIPOLAR ATRIAL ELECTROGRAM AMPLITUDE DURINGEVERYDAY ACTIVITIES - ATRIAL ACTIVE FIXATION VERSUS 2 TYPES OF SINGLE-PASS VDD R LEADS/
Cc. Chan et al., COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF BIPOLAR ATRIAL ELECTROGRAM AMPLITUDE DURINGEVERYDAY ACTIVITIES - ATRIAL ACTIVE FIXATION VERSUS 2 TYPES OF SINGLE-PASS VDD R LEADS/, PACE, 17(11), 1994, pp. 1873-1877
Endocardial P wave amplitude (PWA) is an important determinant of the
atrial sensing capabilities of an atrial-based pacing system. Although
changes in PWA during physical activities are known to occur in DDD/R
pacing, there is little information on the P wave stability in single
pass lead VDD/R pacemakers using floating P wave sensing. We investig
ated the variation of PWA during daily life activities using telemetry
recorded atrial electrograms in 21 patients with DDDR pacemakers (Rel
ay or Elite) and 29 patients with single lead VDD/ R pacemakers (Unify
or Thera). Physical activities resulted in marked individual variabil
ity of PWA but, as a group, there was no significant difference betwee
n PWA during sitting, standing, lying down, and coughing in both DDDR
and VDD/R pacing. In the Elite II pacemaker, walking at 2 miles per ho
ur resulted in significant reduction of PWA (11.6% compared with sitti
ng, P < 0.05). The most consistent reduction in PWA occurred in the re
laxation phase of the Valsalva maneuver (VM), with all pacemakers show
ing a reduction in PWA (mean reduction in PWA compared with sitting in
DDDR and VDD/R were 16.6% and 12.8%, respectively). Two patients with
DDDR pacemakers (Relay) and three patients with VDD/R pacemakers (1 U
nity and 2 Thera) had atrial sensing failure during VM or walking. In
conclusion, large variation in PWA occurs during daily life activities
. The extent of variation is dependent on the patients, types of atria
l lead, and the maneuvers performed. A twice sensing threshold may be
insufficient to ensure adequate atrial sensing during these activities
. The VM, which effects a consistent change in intracardiac volume, is
the most reliable method for bedside evaluation of the lower end of s
ensitivity margin.