This study was performed to compare the frequency of early complicatio
ns after single ch amber versus du al chamber permanent pacemaker impl
antation. Early complication was defined as one occurring in the 6-wee
k period folio wing implantation. We prospectively analyzed consecutiv
e pacemaker implantation from January 1987 to June 1993 at our regiona
l center. All complications were also analyzed for the relationship to
operator experience, the venous access route, and the presence of tem
porary pacing wire at the time of implantation of the permanent pacing
system. A total of 2019 new pacemaker units were implanted during thi
s period. 1733 patients (85.8%) received a VVI pacemaker and 286 (14.2
%) a DDD unit. Wound infection occurred in 11 (0.6%) VVI patients and
6 (2.1%) DDD patients. Lead displacement occurred in 18 (1%) VVI patie
nts and 15 (5.2%) DDD patients (11 [3.8%] atrial and 4 [1.4%] ventricu
lar). There were 10 (0.6%) pneumothoraces, 9 (0.5%) hematomas requirin
g drainage, 1 (0.06%) chylocele, and 2 (0.1%) deaths in the VVI group.
There were 2 (0.7%) pneumothoraces, 2 (0.7%) hematomas, and no deaths
in the DDD group. There was no significant increase in complications
for experienced infrequent implanters (<12 systems per year). In both
groups the subclavian approach was associated with a risk of pneumotho
rax when compared to the cephalic approach. The rate of wound infectio
n was higher in patients who had a temporary pacing wire in place. The
use of prophylactic antibiotics does not appear to affect the inciden
ce of wound infection. The early complications in the DDD group were h
igher than in the VVI group (8.7% vs 2.9%, P<0.05), being mainly due t
o an increased incidence of wound infection and atrial lead displaceme
nt.