IS THE VENTRICULAR EFFECTIVE REFRACTORY PERIOD DIFFERENT WHEN DETERMINED BY INCREMENTAL VERSUS DECREMENTAL SCANNING - THE EFFECT OF PACING CYCLE LENGTH, D-SOTALOL, AND LEVCROMAKALIM
Hm. Leerssen et al., IS THE VENTRICULAR EFFECTIVE REFRACTORY PERIOD DIFFERENT WHEN DETERMINED BY INCREMENTAL VERSUS DECREMENTAL SCANNING - THE EFFECT OF PACING CYCLE LENGTH, D-SOTALOL, AND LEVCROMAKALIM, PACE, 17(11), 1994, pp. 2084-2089
In the clinical setting, the ventricular effective refractory period (
VERP) is determined by an 8-beat drive train (S1S1), followed by a pre
mature stimulus (S2), which is decremented in subsequent drive trains
until capture is lost. Variation in intertrain pauses and capturing ex
tra stimuli disturb steady-state conditions and reduce reproducibility
of values found for the VERP. To increase reproducibility, a protocol
without intertrain pause and incremental scanning (IS) of st was deve
loped. In anesthetized dogs with chronic AV block, determination of th
e VERP using IS and decremental scanning IDS) without intertrain pause
was compared at 800 and 350 msec pacing cycle length (PCL). The measu
rements were repeated after the administration of d-sotalol to lengthe
n the VERP and levcromakalim to shorten the VERP. The results showed n
o difference between IS and DS at both PCLs with or without medication
. Recurrent and abrupt rate changes were avoided during IS, making thi
s the protocol of choice when induction of arrhythmias is to be avoide
d.