REPAIR OF THE AORTIC-ARCH WITH FIBRIN GLUE IN TYPE-A AORTIC DISSECTION

Citation
Jr. Seguin et al., REPAIR OF THE AORTIC-ARCH WITH FIBRIN GLUE IN TYPE-A AORTIC DISSECTION, Journal of cardiac surgery, 9(6), 1994, pp. 734-739
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System",Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
08860440
Volume
9
Issue
6
Year of publication
1994
Pages
734 - 739
Database
ISI
SICI code
0886-0440(1994)9:6<734:ROTAWF>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Location of the intimal tear in the aortic arch in type A aortic disse ction is for many authors an indication for replacement of the aortic arch, but this operation has a high in-hospital mortality rate: 20% to 40%. Instead, we suggest repairing the aortic arch by injecting fibri n glue, which contains a human sealer protein concentrate, between the two dissected layers under circulatory arrest while replacing the asc ending aorta. To evaluate this technique, we reviewed 45 successive pa tients operated on for type A acute aortic dissection between January 1989 and July 1993, of which 6 had the intimal tear located on or exte nding into the aortic arch. Mean age was 71 +/- 4.2 years (range 68 to 74). After proximal supracoronary anastomosis with a collagen-impregn ated graft, aortic arch repair was achieved by injecting fibrin glue b etween the two layers, using circulatory arrest at a mean temperature of 22-degrees-C, with a mean duration of 24 minutes. This obliterated the dissection in the arch and also the intimal flap. The distal part of the graft was then anastomosed to the proximal portion of the aorti c arch at the origin of the innominate artery under circulatory arrest . There were no early or late deaths. All patients were asymptomatic a t a mean follow-up of 2.6 years. Follow-up angioscan showed obliterati on of the dissection in the aortic arch in all patients; there were tw o patients with dilatation of the distal aortic arch of 40 and 45 mm. These results suggest that repair of the aortic arch with fibrin glue facilitates surgery, reduces operative time, and has a lower mortality rate than aortic arch replacement. The risk of possible reoperation f or arch replacement is largely balanced by the good immediate and late results reported here.