S. Naryshkin, THE FALSE-NEGATIVE FRACTION FOR PAPANICOLAOU SMEARS - HOW OFTEN ARE ABNORMAL SMEARS NOT DETECTED BY A STANDARD SCREENING CYTOLOGIST, Archives of pathology and laboratory medicine, 121(3), 1997, pp. 270-272
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,"Medical Laboratory Technology","Medicine, Research & Experimental
Screening error rates have been measured in various ways. The false-ne
gative fraction is advantageous because it is valid for comparisons be
tween laboratories, which is crucial if standards for error rates are
to be developed. False-negative fractions reported or calculated from
data in the literature range from approximately 2% to 28%. Some of the
highest published rates have come from prestigious academic laborator
ies. The lowest rates are from studies that covered terms of a year or
less and in which only small parts of each slide were rescreened or t
he rescreeners were relatively inexperienced. Before standards for fal
se-negative fractions can be set, we must collect more data and encour
age more laboratories to measure the false-negative fraction.