THE FALSE-NEGATIVE FRACTION FOR PAPANICOLAOU SMEARS - HOW OFTEN ARE ABNORMAL SMEARS NOT DETECTED BY A STANDARD SCREENING CYTOLOGIST

Authors
Citation
S. Naryshkin, THE FALSE-NEGATIVE FRACTION FOR PAPANICOLAOU SMEARS - HOW OFTEN ARE ABNORMAL SMEARS NOT DETECTED BY A STANDARD SCREENING CYTOLOGIST, Archives of pathology and laboratory medicine, 121(3), 1997, pp. 270-272
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,"Medical Laboratory Technology","Medicine, Research & Experimental
Journal title
Archives of pathology and laboratory medicine
ISSN journal
00039985 → ACNP
Volume
121
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
270 - 272
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9985(1997)121:3<270:TFFFPS>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Screening error rates have been measured in various ways. The false-ne gative fraction is advantageous because it is valid for comparisons be tween laboratories, which is crucial if standards for error rates are to be developed. False-negative fractions reported or calculated from data in the literature range from approximately 2% to 28%. Some of the highest published rates have come from prestigious academic laborator ies. The lowest rates are from studies that covered terms of a year or less and in which only small parts of each slide were rescreened or t he rescreeners were relatively inexperienced. Before standards for fal se-negative fractions can be set, we must collect more data and encour age more laboratories to measure the false-negative fraction.