FALSE NEGATIVES IN FOCUSED RESCREENING OF PAPANICOLAOU SMEARS - HOW FREQUENTLY ARE ABNORMAL-CELLS DETECTED IN RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF SMEARS PRECEDING CANCER OR HIGH-GRADE INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
Dc. Wilbur, FALSE NEGATIVES IN FOCUSED RESCREENING OF PAPANICOLAOU SMEARS - HOW FREQUENTLY ARE ABNORMAL-CELLS DETECTED IN RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF SMEARS PRECEDING CANCER OR HIGH-GRADE INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA, Archives of pathology and laboratory medicine, 121(3), 1997, pp. 273-276
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,"Medical Laboratory Technology","Medicine, Research & Experimental
The 5-year retrospective rescreening process is an integral part of th
e cytology laboratory's quality assurance program. Its major role is t
he identification of errors in screening and/or interpretation that re
present rare events and patterns. Recognition of such errors can provi
de for reorientation and reeducation of cytology personnel, ultimately
to improve prospective accuracy. Careful research studies have shown
that retrospective rescreening may identify abnormalities on slides di
agnosed as negative in more than 50% of cases analyzed. Surveys of act
ual clinical laboratory programs show detection of abnormalities in si
gnificantly lower percentages, generally in the range of 10% to 30%. T
he majority of cases identified are reclassified in the category of at
ypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Cases of identifie
d high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion are identified as a minor
ity of cases in virtually all laboratories surveyed. In the cases reas
sessed as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, a common cytolog
ic pattern is that of a few isolated, small, ''immature metaplastic,''
dysplastic cells being present.