VARICOSE-VEIN SURGERY WITH PRESERVATION OF THE SAPHENOUS-VEIN - A COMPARISON BETWEEN HIGH LIGATION AVULSION VERSUS SAPHENOFEMORAL BANDING VALVULOPLASTY AVULSION
H. Schanzer et M. Skladany, VARICOSE-VEIN SURGERY WITH PRESERVATION OF THE SAPHENOUS-VEIN - A COMPARISON BETWEEN HIGH LIGATION AVULSION VERSUS SAPHENOFEMORAL BANDING VALVULOPLASTY AVULSION, Journal of vascular surgery, 20(5), 1994, pp. 684-687
Purpose: Surgical treatment of varicose veins with preservation of the
greater saphenous vein (GSV) was studied. Methods: Patients with refl
ux at the saphenofemoral junction and grossly normal GSV were treated
with two different surgical techniques: perivalvular banding valvulopl
asty (PVBV-A) of the saphenous valve, wherein the diameter of the uppe
rmost saphenous valve was narrowed by Dacron-reinforced silicone band
(12 patients, 15 extremities); and high ligation (HL-A) of the sapheno
us vein, wherein the GSV was ligated flush with the femoral vein (14 p
atients, 16 extremities). Both groups also had varicose tributaries of
GSV avulsed through multiple stab incisions. Results: In the HL-A gro
up two GSV (13%) remained completely patent, 10 GSV (62.5%) thrombosed
partially, and the remaining four GSV (25%) had complete thrombosis.
In the PVBV-A group 12 GSV (80%) remained completely patent and withou
t refhux, one GSV (7%) remained patent but showing reflux. Two GSV (13
%) thrombosed completely. There were no surgical complications or recu
rrences (mean follow-up was 9.4 months for PVBV-A and 9.5 months for H
L-A), and the postoperative recovery time was similar for both groups.
Conclusions: Both techniques are equally effective in the early elimi
nation of varicosities. Preservation of the saphenous vein is signific
antly better after PVBV-A (p < 0.01). A prospective randomized trial w
ith long-term follow-up is required.