Tk. Daradkeh et A. Saad, THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE PROPOSED AXIS-V (DISABILITIES) OFICD-10, British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 1994, pp. 683-685
Background. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability a
nd validity of the newly proposed axis V (disabilities) of ICD-10. Met
hod. Eighty-six acutely ill men and women were prospectively recruited
from the Al Ain psychiatric units, UAE. Both versions of ICD-10, the
Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines and the Diagnostic Cri
teria for Research (DCR) were used for coding axis I psychiatric diagn
osis and its grade of severity; the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule
was used to assess disabilities. Results. Inter-rater reliability of
the DAS items ranged from moderate to good, and axis V ratings correct
ly predicted 84% of the observed classification on axis I. Conclusion.
Axis V is a valid measure of disabilities, but is limited by its mode
st reliability.