THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE PROPOSED AXIS-V (DISABILITIES) OFICD-10

Citation
Tk. Daradkeh et A. Saad, THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE PROPOSED AXIS-V (DISABILITIES) OFICD-10, British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 1994, pp. 683-685
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,Psychiatry
ISSN journal
00071250
Volume
165
Year of publication
1994
Pages
683 - 685
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1250(1994)165:<683:TRAVOT>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Background. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability a nd validity of the newly proposed axis V (disabilities) of ICD-10. Met hod. Eighty-six acutely ill men and women were prospectively recruited from the Al Ain psychiatric units, UAE. Both versions of ICD-10, the Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines and the Diagnostic Cri teria for Research (DCR) were used for coding axis I psychiatric diagn osis and its grade of severity; the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule was used to assess disabilities. Results. Inter-rater reliability of the DAS items ranged from moderate to good, and axis V ratings correct ly predicted 84% of the observed classification on axis I. Conclusion. Axis V is a valid measure of disabilities, but is limited by its mode st reliability.