Ca. Dickman et al., MORPHOLOGY AND KINEMATICS OF THE BABOON UPPER CERVICAL-SPINE - A MODEL OF THE ATLANTOAXIAL COMPLEX, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 19(22), 1994, pp. 2518-2523
Study Design. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed to
compare the anatomy and biomechanics of baboon and human upper cervica
l spines. Objectives. This study examined the baboon as a potential mo
del for in vivo and in vitro atlantoaxial research. Summary of Backgro
und Data. A variety of animal models have been used for spine research
; however, no species have been used for C1-C2 research. Most species
have remarkably different C1-C2 morphology compared with that of human
s. Methods. Twenty baboon and seven human normal adult cadaveric upper
cervical spines were studied morphologically. C1-C2 motion segments w
ere analyzed biomechanically using a flexibility method of testing wit
h physiologic range, nondestructive loading. Motion and load-deformati
on relationships were studied during flexion, extension, bilateral lat
eral bending, and bilateral axial rotation. Results. The bones and lig
aments of the baboon and human upper cervical vertebrae have similarly
proportioned structures, identical individual components, and similar
geometric configurations. The average size of the baboon vertebrae wa
s 50% to 60% of the human specimens. There were several minor anatomic
al differences. Baboons had more horizontal C2-C3 facet joints and mor
e vertical C1-C2 articular surfaces; the vertebral arteries were encas
ed in a continuous bony canal in C1. Biomechanical testing demonstrate
d that baboons and humans had similarly proportioned neutral zones and
elastic zones. Compared with humans, baboons had a 2-degrees to 9-deg
rees wider range of motion in all directions. Conclusions. The baboon
and human upper cervical anatomy and biomechanics are similar. The bab
oon may be useful to study atlantoaxial biomechanics and pathology.