ANALYSIS OF DNA-ADDUCTS OF 2-AMINO-1-METHYL-6-PHENYLIMIDAZO[4,5-B]PYRIDINE IN RAT AND HUMAN TISSUES BY ALKALINE-HYDROLYSIS AND GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY ELECTRON-CAPTURE MASS-SPECTROMETRY - VALIDATION BY COMPARISON WITH P-32 POSTLABELING

Citation
Md. Friesen et al., ANALYSIS OF DNA-ADDUCTS OF 2-AMINO-1-METHYL-6-PHENYLIMIDAZO[4,5-B]PYRIDINE IN RAT AND HUMAN TISSUES BY ALKALINE-HYDROLYSIS AND GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY ELECTRON-CAPTURE MASS-SPECTROMETRY - VALIDATION BY COMPARISON WITH P-32 POSTLABELING, Chemical research in toxicology, 7(6), 1994, pp. 733-739
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Toxicology,Chemistry
ISSN journal
0893228X
Volume
7
Issue
6
Year of publication
1994
Pages
733 - 739
Database
ISI
SICI code
0893-228X(1994)7:6<733:AODO2>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
A sensitive and specific method has been developed to measure levels o f 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) adducted to D NA in tissues. The method is based on alkaline hydrolysis of PhIP from DNA, followed by organic solvent extraction, derivatization to form t he electron-capturing bis(pentafluorobenzyl) derivative, and analysis by gas chromatography/electron capture mass spectrometry (GC/MS) using a deuterium-labeled internal standard. The method can detect PhIP-DNA adducts at levels down to 0.03 fmol of PhIP/mu g of DNA (1 PhIP adduc t/10(8) normal nucleotides) for a 100 mu g sample of DNA. The method i s reproducible for sample sizes ranging up to at least 1000 mu g of DN A. A series of 20 DNA samples from 5 tissues of rats treated with a si ngle oral dose of PhIP were analyzed both by alkaline hydrolysis-GC/MS and by P-32-postlabeling. Results from the two methods were highly co rrelated (r(2) = 0.83), with adduct levels determined by alkaline hydr olysis-GC/MS averaging about 60% of the levels determined by P-32-post labeling. A pilot survey of 24 individual human tissue DNA samples, in cluding pancreas (n = 12), colon mucosa (n = 6), and urinary bladder e pithelium (n = 6), was carried out by alkaline hydrolysis-GC/MS and P- 32-postlabeling. Both methods provided evidence for PhIP-DNA adducts i n two of the colon samples, but not in the samples from human pancreas or urinary bladder.