ANALYSIS OF DNA-ADDUCTS OF 2-AMINO-1-METHYL-6-PHENYLIMIDAZO[4,5-B]PYRIDINE IN RAT AND HUMAN TISSUES BY ALKALINE-HYDROLYSIS AND GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY ELECTRON-CAPTURE MASS-SPECTROMETRY - VALIDATION BY COMPARISON WITH P-32 POSTLABELING
Md. Friesen et al., ANALYSIS OF DNA-ADDUCTS OF 2-AMINO-1-METHYL-6-PHENYLIMIDAZO[4,5-B]PYRIDINE IN RAT AND HUMAN TISSUES BY ALKALINE-HYDROLYSIS AND GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY ELECTRON-CAPTURE MASS-SPECTROMETRY - VALIDATION BY COMPARISON WITH P-32 POSTLABELING, Chemical research in toxicology, 7(6), 1994, pp. 733-739
A sensitive and specific method has been developed to measure levels o
f 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) adducted to D
NA in tissues. The method is based on alkaline hydrolysis of PhIP from
DNA, followed by organic solvent extraction, derivatization to form t
he electron-capturing bis(pentafluorobenzyl) derivative, and analysis
by gas chromatography/electron capture mass spectrometry (GC/MS) using
a deuterium-labeled internal standard. The method can detect PhIP-DNA
adducts at levels down to 0.03 fmol of PhIP/mu g of DNA (1 PhIP adduc
t/10(8) normal nucleotides) for a 100 mu g sample of DNA. The method i
s reproducible for sample sizes ranging up to at least 1000 mu g of DN
A. A series of 20 DNA samples from 5 tissues of rats treated with a si
ngle oral dose of PhIP were analyzed both by alkaline hydrolysis-GC/MS
and by P-32-postlabeling. Results from the two methods were highly co
rrelated (r(2) = 0.83), with adduct levels determined by alkaline hydr
olysis-GC/MS averaging about 60% of the levels determined by P-32-post
labeling. A pilot survey of 24 individual human tissue DNA samples, in
cluding pancreas (n = 12), colon mucosa (n = 6), and urinary bladder e
pithelium (n = 6), was carried out by alkaline hydrolysis-GC/MS and P-
32-postlabeling. Both methods provided evidence for PhIP-DNA adducts i
n two of the colon samples, but not in the samples from human pancreas
or urinary bladder.