Two different consistency criteria are considered for the stress tense
r expressions of two different kinetic theory models for dilute polyme
r solutions. The criteria are material objectivity and thermodynamic c
onsistency. Two separate approaches for checking thermodynamic consist
ency are considered, the first proposed by Grmela [Phys. Lett. 111A, 4
1 (1985)] and the second by Jongschaap [Lecture Notes in Physics (Spri
nger, Berlin, 1991)]. The two models considered are a Hookean dumbbell
model with internal,viscosity (no linearization or rotation matrix ap
proximations), and an inertial, elastic bead-spring chain. Both sets o
f criteria may be applied to these models without finding either a clo
sed-form expression for the stress tenser, or solving any of the equat
ions. We find that the Giesekus form for the stress tenser expression
for a Hookean dumbbell with internal viscosity is both thermodynamical
ly consistent and objective, whereas the Kramers form is not thermodyn
amically consistent. The Kramers form for the stress tenser is found t
o be thermodynamically consistent for an inertial, elastic bead-spring
chain, but is not materially objective. We also find that the approac
hes of Grmela and Jongschaap are the same, although each requires a di
fferent ansatz for the relationship between thermodynamic quantities a
nd polymer conformations.