Jc. Gradybenson et al., POSTOPERATIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS WITH DUPLEX ULTRASONOGRAPHY AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 76A(11), 1994, pp. 1649-1657
Duplex ultrasonography of the lower extremity was used for routine non
-invasive screening for asymptomatic proximal and distal deep venous t
hrombosis, for monitoring of potential propagation of deep venous thro
mbosis from distal to proximal, and for confirmation of the resolution
of proximal deep venous thrombosis after treatment. In the first part
of the study, to substantiate the accuracy of duplex ultrasonography,
130 lower limbs (seventy-nine patients) were studied with that modali
ty as well as with venography after a total hip or total knee arthropl
asty. Compared with venography, duplex ultrasonography demonstrated 10
0 per cent sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the detection of
proximal deep venous thrombosis and 88 per cent sensitivity, 98 per c
ent specificity, and 98 per cent accuracy for the detection of distal
deep venous thrombosis. In the second part of the study, 100 patients
who had had a total knee arthroplasty and had been managed with pneuma
tic stockings and aspirin for prophylaxis against deep venous thrombos
is had screening of both lower extremities with duplex ultrasonography
on the fourth postoperative day. Duplex ultrasonography demonstrated
proximal deep venous thrombosis in seven patients and distal deep veno
us thrombosis in twenty-two patients; all twenty-nine patients were as
ymptomatic. The patients who had distal deep venous thrombosis had sur
veillance with serial duplex ultrasonography on the seventh and fourte
enth postoperative days; five of these patients were found to have had
propagation of the thrombosis to the proximal deep veins. Proximal de
ep venous thrombosis, found on duplex screening, or propagation of the
thrombosis from distal to proximal, found on serial surveillance, war
ranted anticoagulation therapy in twelve asymptomatic patients; serial
duplex ultrasonography was then used to confirm subsequent resolution
of the proximal deep venous thrombosis. The seventy-one patients who
had a negative result on duplex ultrasonography and the seventeen pati
ents who were seen to have a stable distal deep venous thrombosis on s
erial duplex surveillance were followed clinically for a minimum of th
ree months postoperatively; they remained asymptomatic for thromboembo
lic disease. The final rate of deep venous thrombosis (before anticoag
ulation) was twenty-nine of 100 patients, with twelve having a proxima
l deep venous thrombosis and seventeen, a distal deep venous thrombosi
s; all twenty-nine were asymptomatic. One patient who had a proximal d
eep venous thrombosis, detected on duplex screening on the fourth post
operative day had a non-fatal pulmonary embolism on the fifth postoper
ative day. Duplex ultrasonography allowed fewer patients to have antic
oagulation therapy, by confirmation of the absence of proximal deep ve
nous thrombosis or the stability of distal deep venous thrombosis in e
ighty-eight of the 100 patients. It also demonstrated the effectivenes
s of prophylaxis and treatment of deep venous thrombosis by confirmati
on of the absence or the resolution of deep venous thrombosis in all 1
00 patients.