Gm. Coombes et Rj. Millard, THE ACCURACY OF PORTABLE ULTRASOUND SCANNING IN THE MEASUREMENT OF RESIDUAL URINE VOLUME, The Journal of urology, 152(6), 1994, pp. 2083-2085
The accuracy of 2 successive models of a portable (2.5 kg.) ultrasound
unit in determining residual urine volumes in 100 patients was assess
ed. Ultrasound measurements were compared to post-scan bladder volumes
obtained by catheterization and fluoroscopic screening in the same pa
tients. The first ultrasound unit (group 1, 50 patients) showed correl
ation with residual volumes of 0.86 (R(2) = 0.73) and a mean differenc
e from the true residual volume of 41 mi. (95% confidence interval 26
to 55 mi.). The second ultrasound unit (group 2, 50 patients) showed c
orrelation with residual volumes of 0.97 (R(2) = 0.94) and a mean diff
erence from the true residual volume of 24 mi. (95% confidence interva
l 17 to 31 mi.). The differences in volumes were significantly lower w
ith scanner 2 (t = 2.02, p = 0.047). The mean difference between cathe
ter volume estimate and true bladder volume was 25 mi. (95% confidence
interval 16 to 34 mi.). The accuracy of the BladderScan BVI 2500+ sca
nner is as good as catheter estimations of true residual volume and i
s sufficient to recommend its use as an alternative to catheterization
for the determination of residual urine volume.