OBJECTIVES. Hip replacement is the preferred treatment for displaced f
emoral neck fractures, whereas other less expensive procedures are pre
ferred for nondisplaced fractures. The authors determined whether ther
e was geographic variation in the use of hip replacement to treat disp
laced and nondisplaced fractures. METHODS. The authors studied 332 pat
ients, age 65 years or older, hospitalized with a femoral neck fractur
e in three cities. RESULTS. The population was 55% over age 80, 80% fe
male, and lived in Houston (17%), Pittsburgh (29%), and Minneapolis (5
4%). Rates of hip replacement varied by city (Houston-84%, Pittsburgh-
77%, Minneapolis-63%; P = 0.002), with great variability among patient
s with nondisplaced fractures (Houston-88%, Pittsburgh-77%, and Minnea
polis-56%; P = 0.0001), and no variation among those with displaced fr
actures (P = 0.72). Other factors associated with hip replacement are
history of hip fracture (P = 0.003) and cerebrovascular disease (P les
s than or equal to 0.10), APACHE II-APS score (P = 0.09), and impacted
fracture (P = 0.001). Sociodemographic and functional status (perceiv
ed health; activities of daily living and instrumental activities of d
aily living dependencies) were not associated with hip replacement (P
> 0.10). In a logistic model controlling for prior history, APACHE II-
APS, and fracture characteristics, city remained a significant predict
or of hip replacement (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Despite an absence of
evidence supporting its appropriateness and a much higher cost, hip re
placement is used to treat nondisplaced fractures much more frequently
in Houston and Pittsburgh than in Minneapolis.