This paper addresses some general issues concerning consumption that a
rise from the work of Bauman, Beck and Giddens. All maintain that biog
raphy is a reflexive project and that life-styles and consumption are
critical to identity-formation and re-formation. Bauman, especially, m
aintains that this is a source of anxiety, the freedom implied by cons
umer choice entailing a commensurate degree of personal responsibility
. He observes, for instance, that a function of advertising is to assu
age the self-doubt that accompanies choice. I seek to argue that these
accounts of the impact of reflexive modernisation on self-identity ar
e misjudged. Consumption would be a much less pleasurable practice if
it was both subject to ever-expanding free choice and the decisions ma
de were fundamental components of a reflexive process of identity-form
ation. Indeed, the consequence might well be high and visible levels o
f distress among those individuals most deeply involved. That this is
not apparent suggests that the relationships specified between the pro
cess of identity-formation and consumption is tendentious. Consumption
may be anxiety-provoking for some groups; there is a real element of
risk involved in choosing inappropriately. But there are many mechanis
ms that serve to compensate. I explore those mechanisms, suggesting th
at anxiety is avoided through certain processes of group identificatio
n and social regulation which the reflexive modernisation thesis claim
s have atrophied. I conclude that such considerations require that the
se theories about the relationship between consumption and self-identi
ty be modified.