Y. Ogasawara et al., CHIMERAS OF SURFACTANT PROTEIN-A AND PROTEIN-D IDENTIFY THE CARBOHYDRATE-RECOGNITION DOMAINS AS ESSENTIAL FOR PHOSPHOLIPID INTERACTION, The Journal of biological chemistry, 269(47), 1994, pp. 29785-29792
Pulmonary surfactant proteins A (SP-A) and D (SP-D) possess similar st
ructure as members of the mammalian C-type lectin superfamily. Both pr
oteins are composed of four characteristic domains which are: 1) an NH
2-terminal domain involved in interchain disulfide formation (denoted
Al domain for SP-A or D1 for SP-D); 2) a collagenous domain (denoted A
2 or D2); 3) a neck domain (denoted A3 or D3); and 4) a carbohydrate r
ecognition domain (denoted A4 or D4). SP-A specifically binds to dipal
mitoylphosphatidylcholine, the major lipid component of surfactant, an
d can regulate the secretion and recycling of this lipid by alveolar t
ype II cells. SP-D binds to phosphatidylinositol (PI) and glucosylcera
mide (GlcCer), and its role in alveolar lipid metabolism remains to be
clarified. To understand the relationship between the structure and t
he function of both proteins with respect to their interaction with li
pids, we expressed recombinant wild type rat SP-D (rSP-D) and chimeric
molecules of SP-A and SP-D (A1A2A3D4, A1A2D3D4, and D1D2A3A4) using a
baculovirus expression system, and performed lipid binding and aggreg
ation assays. The rSP-D effectively competed with I-125-labeIed native
rat SP-D in a solid phase binding assay to PI and GIcCer in a manner
nearly identical to native SP-D. The rSP-D also bound to PI liposomes
with approximately half the affinity of native rat SP-D. Chimera A1A2D
3D4 competed with iodinated SP-D in the solid phase binding assay to b
oth PI and GlcCer. This chimera did not bind to dipalmitoylphosphatidy
Icholine (DPPC) liposomes or induce their aggregation. Chimera A1A2A3D
4 did not bind solid phase PI or GlcCer but was equivalent to rSP-D in
binding to PI liposomes. This chimera exhibited weak binding to DPPC
but failed to aggregate DPPC liposomes. Chimera D1D2A3A4 failed to bin
d PI and GlcCer and bound weakly to DPPC liposomes but was quite effec
tive at inducing aggregation of DPPC Iiposomes. These findings demonst
rate that the D3 plus D4 domains of SP-D play a role in lipid binding
and that the D4 domain is essential for PI binding. Furthermore, the A
3 domain of SP-A cannot account for all the lipid binding activity of
this protein. In addition, the results implicate the A4 domain of SP-A
as an important structural domain in lipid aggregation phenomena.