TUNING THE MECHANISM OF DNA CLEAVAGE PHOTOSENSITIZED BY RUTHENIUM DIPYRIDOPHENAZINE COMPLEXES BY VARYING THE STRUCTURE OF THE 2 NON-INTERCALATING LIGANDS
C. Sentagne et al., TUNING THE MECHANISM OF DNA CLEAVAGE PHOTOSENSITIZED BY RUTHENIUM DIPYRIDOPHENAZINE COMPLEXES BY VARYING THE STRUCTURE OF THE 2 NON-INTERCALATING LIGANDS, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology.B, Biology, 26(2), 1994, pp. 165-174
The influence of the nature of ligands on the efficiency of ruthenium
complexes for photosensitizing DNA cleavage was investigated. Ru(bipy)
(2)dppz(2+) and Ru(bpz)(2)dppz(2+) were selected as DNA breakers on th
e basis of their high affinity for DNA due to the presence of a dppz l
igand which can partially intercalate in the major groove of DNA. Thei
r photosensitizing properties were compared to those of Ru(bipy)(3)(2), a complex which binds to DNA with a far lower constant. Upon irradi
ation, these complexes promoted the formation of single strand breaks
in supercoiled Phi X 174 DNA. Unexpectedly, Ru(bipy)(2)dppz(2+) was fo
und to be less efficient than Ru(bipy)(3)(2+) whatever the dye concent
ration or the [base pair]/[Ru] molar ratio r. Scavenging experiments h
ave shown that the oxidative DNA cleavage induced by Ru(bipy)(2)dppz(2
+) mainly results from a Type II mechanism. The behavior of Ru(bipy)(2
)dppz(2+) was different: this compound was clearly more efficient than
Ru(bipy)(3)(2+) as DNA breaker and its efficiency was not modified by
the presence of oxygen or by addition of scavengers of reactive oxyge
n species. In this case, a mechanism involving electron transfer betwe
en the excited state of the ruthenium complex and the guanine residue
was proposed in agreement with emission lifetime measurements. The cha
nge in mechanism observed between Ru(bipy)(2)dppz(2+) and Ru (dipy)(2)
dppz(2+) results from an increase of the reduction potential of the ru
thenium complexes in the excited state, which appears to be the main f
actor controlling the efficiency.