H. Lokstein et al., THE ROLE OF LIGHT-HARVESTING COMPLEX-II IN EXCESS EXCITATION-ENERGY DISSIPATION - AN IN-VIVO FLUORESCENCE STUDY ON THE ORIGIN OF HIGH-ENERGY QUENCHING, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology.B, Biology, 26(2), 1994, pp. 175-184
A functionally intact light-harvesting complex II (LHC II) was recentl
y inferred to be involved in the induction of high-energy-dependent ch
lorophyll (Chl) fluorescence quenching (qE) in leaves (Lokstein et al.
, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol, 19 (1993) 217-225). The present st
udy was performed to further elucidate this finding and, in particular
to analyze the role of the xanthophyll cycle for qE formation. Measur
ements of modulated Chl fluorescence using the saturating flash techni
que and of xanthophyll cycle activity were performed in barley leaves
of wild type (WT) and a Chl-b-less mutant with reduced LHC II (chlorin
a 3613) in the absence and presence of the violaxanthin (V) de-epoxida
se inhibitor dithiothreitol (DTT). The results can be summarized as fo
llows: (a) The content of xanthophyll cycle-constituents in mutant lea
ves is lower on a leaf area basis (but significantly higher when relat
ed to Chl a content); the mutant has a substantially higher ability to
convert V into antheraxanthin (A) and zeaxanthin (Z) when compared wi
th the WT. In both genotypes in response to DTT treatment only low lev
els of A accumulated and Z formation was almost completely suppressed.
(b) The photochemical efficiency of photosystem (PS) II expressed as
the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence, F-V/F-M, in dark-adapte
d leaves is virtually the same in WT and the mutant and remains invari
ant to treatment with DTT. (c) Nearly complete abolishment of the 'fas
t' relaxation phase of non-photochemical quenching (qNf) was observed
after DTT treatment. Suppression of qNf (as an approximate measure of
qE) accompanied by the disappearance of a 'rapid' phase of F-O quenchi
ng relaxation provides strong evidence for qE being an antenna associa
ted phenomenon. (d) A 'medium' phase of qN relaxation (qNm) was not in
fluenced by DTT treatment at all light intensities investigated. Thus,
the results do not indicate a significant contribution of persisting
xanthophyll-dependent (A+Z) quenching to qNm. The phenomenon of qNm ca
n not be explained by chloroplast movements. The data obtained support
the hypothesis that Delta pH-mediated synergistic operation of both,
structural rearrangement of LHC II and xanthophyll-cycle activity, is
required for efficient qE formation in vivo.