Bg. Skov et al., DIFFERENTIATION OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE LUNG AND MALIGNANT MESOTHELIOMA - PREDICTIVE VALUE AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF IMMUNOREACTIVE ANTIBODIES, Histopathology, 25(5), 1994, pp. 431-437
A panel of antibodies against keratins, epithelial membrane antigen (E
MA), epithelial antigen (Ber-EP4), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tum
our-associated glycoprotein (B72.3), vimentin and LeuM1 was applied to
sections of adenocarcinoma of the lung and malignant mesothelioma in
a randomized design. The proportion of stained tumour cells within eac
h section was estimated independently in five categories by three path
ologists (no positive tumour cells, 1-10%, 11-33%, 34-66% and more tha
n 67% positive tumour cells). The kappa values representing the chance
corrected interobserver agreement for the different antibodies in suc
h a five group assessment were between 0.38 and 0.72. In two group ass
essment the kappa values were between 0.53 and 0.94. Nosological sensi
tivity and nosological specificity were calculated for all antibodies,
and diagnostic sensitivity and diagnostic specificity (predictive val
ues) were calculated for the Ber-EP4, CEA, B72.3, LeuM1 and vimentin.
The difference between nosological sensitivity and nosologic specifici
ty and the clinically relevant predictive values of positive and negat
ive tests were demonstrated. In respect of the reproducibility and the
diagnostic power defined by the predictive values, we demonstrated th
at a panel of antibodies, including CEA, Ber-EP4 and B72.3 and, to a l
esser degree, LeuM1 and vimentin is applicable for the histopathologic
al distinction between adenocarcinoma of the lung and malignant mesoth
eliomas. Before introduction of new diagnostic tests, including new an
tibodies, the prevalence of the tested tumours should be estimated. No
sological sensitivity and nosological specificity should be converted
to predictive values.