CHANGES IN FAT-FREE MASS IN OVERWEIGHT PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS ON A WEIGHT REDUCING REGIMEN - A COMPARISON OF 8 DIFFERENT BODY-COMPOSITION METHODS
Bl. Heitmann et al., CHANGES IN FAT-FREE MASS IN OVERWEIGHT PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS ON A WEIGHT REDUCING REGIMEN - A COMPARISON OF 8 DIFFERENT BODY-COMPOSITION METHODS, International journal of obesity, 18(12), 1994, pp. 812-819
The aim of this work was to compare and validate seven different metho
ds for estimating changes in fat free mass, in patients suffering from
rheumatoid arthritis. Measurements were made of fat and fat free mass
before and after 12 weeks on an energy restricted, protein rich diet
and physical training. The subjects were sixteen female and three male
overweight out-patients (mean body mass index at baseline: 30 kg/m(2)
) suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, according to the criteria of th
e American Rheumatism Association. Fat free mass was estimated by eigh
t different body composition methods (a four-compartment model, total
body water, total body potassium, impedance, near infrared interactanc
e, creatinine excretion, body mass index and skinfold measurements). M
ean weight loss was 2.7 kg fat and 1.7 kg fat free mass. There was no
difference between measurements of mean change in fat free mass by the
four-compartment model and the other methods, except for the creatini
ne method (P = 0.03). Compared to the four-compartment method, the tot
al body water method gave the most accurate estimate of individual fat
free mass changes (residual Mean Square: 0.4 kg), second to this meth
od, the impedance method, seemed most valid (residual Mean Square: 0.8
kg). Accuracies of the other methods were lower (residual Mean Square
between 1.8 and 19.0 kg). Of eight methods for estimating changes in
FFM, the TBW method gave the most accurate estimate of individual FFM
changes, compared to a four-compartment model used as reference. None
of the other methods were valid for estimating changes in FFM on an in
dividual level. Estimation of individual changes in fat free mass by m
ost methods may not be sufficient for clinical purposes.