This study examines grammatical and discourse-pragmatic reflexes of th
e existential and resultative readings of the English present perfect.
I present both negative and positive arguments in favor of the claim
that the present perfect is ambiguous (rather than vague) with respect
to these readings. In particular, I argue that the resultative presen
t-perfect represents a formal idiom: a morphosyntactic form characteri
zed by idiosyncratic constraints upon grammar, meaning and use. Certai
n constraints upon the resultative present-perfect, in particular that
which prevents it from denoting a pragmatically presupposed event pro
position, can be MOTIVATED with respect to a discourse-pragmatic oppos
ition involving the preterite. However, such constraints cannot be PRE
DICTED from functional oppositions or any general semantic principles.
Finally, I suggest that mastery of aspectual grammar crucially entail
s knowledge of such idiomatic form-meaning pairings.