Jl. Barnett et al., THE EFFECTS OF MODIFYING THE AMOUNT OF HUMAN CONTACT ON BEHAVIORAL, PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PRODUCTION RESPONSES OF LAYING HENS, Applied animal behaviour science, 41(1-2), 1994, pp. 87-100
The effects of modifying the amount of human contact on the behavioura
l (withdrawal responses to humans), physiological (corticosterone and
immunological) and production (hen-day egg production) responses of la
ying hens were examined in a total of 144 hens (White Leghorn X Austra
lorp) housed in two-bird conventional cages in two treatments: (1) 'Mi
nimal' - in which birds received regular but limited human contact dur
ing egg collection (daily), inspections (daily) and feeding (twice wee
kly); the birds' vision of humans was limited to what they could see t
hrough a 5 cm gap between the bottom of a blind and the egg tray. (2)
'Additional' - in which birds received a total of 15 min additional (t
o routine husbandry) human contact per day for 5 days per week. The tr
eatments were imposed for 17 weeks from 19 weeks of age and then all b
irds received routine husbandry. Measurements were taken on 12 cages p
er treatment at three periods over the following 3 weeks. At each samp
ling period there were two behaviour tests (3 days apart) to measure w
ithdrawal responses of birds to an approaching human using birds remai
ning in their cages (approaching human test - AHT) and birds removed f
rom their cages and placed on a table at the end of an enclosed corrid
or (shute test - ST). At the end of the ST, a blood sample was taken f
or corticosterone analysis and 3 days after the AHT, a measure of cell
-mediated immunity (CMI) was made. Hen-day egg production was measured
from 23 to 36 weeks of age. In both behaviour tests there were fewer
withdrawal responses in the 'Additional' treatment and they were maint
ained over time. A lower proportion of birds moved away from the human
in the ST (0.41 vs. 0.64; P < 0.06) and the number of times (max. = 3
) that birds were in the front 10 cm of the cage and oriented forwards
in the AHT were greater (2.12 vs. 1.22 and 2.54 vs. 1.80, respectivel
y; P < 0.01). The corticosterone response at the end of the ST was gre
ater in the 'Minimal' treatment (P < 0.05) and there were no changes w
ith time. CMI was greater in the 'Additional' treatment only at the fi
rst sampling period (2.1 vs. 1.4 mm; P < 0.01) and hen-day egg product
ion was higher in the 'Additional' treatment over the experiment (89.4
vs. 83.1%; P < 0.05). Compared with the 'Minimal' treatment, increasi
ng the amount of human contact reduced the level of fear of humans sho
wn by birds, on the basis of their withdrawal responses in the two beh
avioural tests and decreased corticosterone response to handling, with
consequent effects on production. The mechanism may involve a chronic
stress response since adverse changes in cell-mediated immunological
responsiveness were found in the 'Minimal' treatment. The results indi
cate that human contact may be an important determinant of bird behavi
our, production and possibly welfare.